Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 19.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Sep;16(9):736–741. doi: 10.1097/JGP.0b013e31817b609a

TABLE 2.

Linear Regression for Severity of Suicide Ideation (N = 125)

Severity of Suicide Ideation
Univariate
Multivariate
Variables Unstandardized Beta (SE) Standardized Beta Unstandardized Beta (SE) Standardized Beta
Age .009 (.003) .242b .004 (.003) .110
Gender −.019 (.072) −.024 −.008 (.064) −.011
HRSD −.012 (.005) −.231b −.007 (.005) −.134
BHS −.019 (.005) −.297b −.008 (.006) −.130
RFL-SC .008 (.002) .368c .001 (.003) .060
RFL-RF .024 (.008) .266b .004 (.010) .043
RFL-FS .021 (.007) .262b .015 (.008) .181
RFL-MO .021 (.005) .339c .009 (.007) .143
RFL-RF X BHS
−.003 (.001) −.198a

Note: Gender = male; HRSD = Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression without the suicide ideation item; BHS = Beck Hopelessness Scale; RFL = Reasons for Living; SC = Survival and Coping; RF = Responsibility to Family; FS = Fear of Suicide; MO = Moral Objections.

All variables were entered simultaneously into the multivariate analysis. A transformation (inverse of the SSI score +1) was applied to approximate a normal distribution.

Consequently, unlike the analyses reported in Table 1, in this Table lower scores reflect higher levels of suicide ideation. Analyses of Variance (ANOVA) suggested an acceptable fit of the multiple regression model for the severity of current suicide ideation [F (9, 115) = 4.76, p < .001], which accounted for 27% of the variance (adjusted = .21).

T-tests were used for significance testing (df = 124).

a

p < .05.

b

p < .01.

c

p < .001.