Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Proteome Res. 2009 Jul;8(7):3558–3567. doi: 10.1021/pr900253y

Table 2.

Experiment 2: Training has been performed with samples from five slices and the remaining one was used for testing. We trained the forest with 198 samples per class and slice and no post-hoc smoothing was performed. The dash indicates that no labels are available for a certain slice/class combination. Average SE and PPV values are between 80 and 95 percent. We see that a Random Forest trained with samples from five out of the six slices generalizes reasonably well and can be used to classify the test slice.

tissue class
slice measure necrotic viable gelatine interface glass/hole mean
S3 SE 92.8 82.7 - 89.7 89.5 88.7
PPV 57.6 96.8 - 41.9 98.6 73.7

S4 SE 64.7 98.3 - 89.9 97.1 87.4
PPV 95.6 85.7 - 98.3 86.3 91.4

S5 SE 94.7 91.3 86.7 - 98.1 92.7
PPV 86.7 96.8 100 - 99.4 95.8

S7 SE 99.4 75.4 99.1 99.6 89.1 92.5
PPV 30.4 99.7 99.5 94.8 99.5 84.8

S9 SE 81.0 96.2 84.0 96.4 97.2 90.1
PPV 54.0 97.3 99.4 60.0 97.0 81.5

S11 SE 96.4 90.4 87.4 99.1 91.0 92.8
PPV 40.0 98.7 99.4 68.3 99.7 81.2