Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):823–832. doi: 10.1037/a0013802

Table 4.

Maximum likelihood estimates based on a quadratic growth model for FL scores (n=503)

Parameter MLE (SE) 95% CI
FL Level 23.6 (2.99) (17.7, 29.5)
FL Linear change .173 (.116) (−.0544, .400)
FL Acceleration .011 (.019) (−.0262, .0482)
Within-individual effect of SS −.046 (.011) (−.0676, −.0244)
Between-individual effect of SS −.208 (.030) (−.267, −.149)
Effect of AGE on FL Level .254 (.039) (.178, .330)

Covariance Coefficient

Intercept, Intercept 75.2 (5.49)
Linear, Intercept .077 (1.10)
Linear, Linear 1.58 (.493)
Quadratic, Intercept −.023 (.169)
Quadratic, Linear −.196 (.075)
Quadratic, Quadratic .038 (.013)

Notes: Tabled values are maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) with robust standard errors (SE) in parentheses. MLE's are averaged across results based on 10 imputed data sets obtained using MI with a MCMC method assuming missing data were missing at random. SE's take MI into account. The 95% CI's are estimated 95% confidence intervals for the fixed effects. Time is centered at the start of the longitudinal study. FL=functional limitation; SS=Social Support; Age=Chronological Age