Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2008 Dec;23(4):823–832. doi: 10.1037/a0013802

Table 5.

Maximum likelihood estimates for predicting Aging scores by characteristics of change in FL scores for time centered at the start of the longitudinal study (n=503)

Fixed Effect MLE (SE) 95% CI
Constant −.268 (.534) (−1.31, .78)
FL Level 23.6 (2.99) (17.7, 29.5)
FL Linear change .173 (.116) (−.054, .40)
FL Acceleration .011 (.019) (−.026, .048)
Within-individual effect of SS on FL −.046 (.011) (−.068, −.024)
Between-individual effect of SS on FL −.208 (.030) (−.27, −.15)
Effect of AGE on FL Level .255 (.039) (.18, .33)
Effect of FL Level on AGING −.051 (.011) (−.073, −.029)
Effect of Mean SS on AGING .041 (.005) (.031, .051)

Variance/covariance coefficient MLE (SE)

Intercept, Intercept 75.0 (5.49)
Linear, Intercept .157 (1.11)
Linear, Linear 1.58 (.493)
Quadratic, Intercept −.023 (.168)
Quadratic, Linear −.201 (.076)
Quadratic, Quadratic .039 (.014)

Residual AGING Variance 1.97 (.453)

Notes: Tabled values are maximum likelihood estimates (MLE) with robust standard errors (SE) in parentheses. MLE's are averaged across results based on 10 imputed data sets obtained using MI with a MCMC method assuming missing data were missing at random. SE's take MI into account. The 95% CI's are estimated 95% confidence intervals for the fixed effects. Time is centered at the start of the longitudinal study. FL=functional limitation; SS=Social Support; Age=Chronological Age, Aging=Attitude Toward Aging