Skip to main content
. 2000 Aug 15;97(18):9955–9960. doi: 10.1073/pnas.160075697

Table 1.

Theoretical and biophysical data for p53tet

Amino acid Molecular weight* Molecular weight apparent Sigma N Tm§ ΔE Hydrophobicity
Mutations at residue 340
 Met (WT) 85** 22.2 1.68
 Ser 8,103 32,370 3,000 4.0 59 13.3 −0.05
 Gln 8,144 33,730 3,250 4.1 62 8.6 −0.30
 Ala** 4 55 13.4 0.18
 His 8,153 27,790 2,350 3.4 58 11.1 0.18
 Lys 8,144 30,440 2,830 3.4 66 2.5 −1.35
 Glu 8,145 16,630 1,000 2.0 34 3.8 −0.87
 Asp 8,131 15,870 1,000 2.0 38 11.3 −1.05
Mutations at residue 344
 Leu (WT) 85** 22.2 1.68
 Ala 6,080‡‡ 15,840 2,500 2.6 49 5.4 0.18
 Ala** 2 47 5.4 0.18
 Gln 8,880 19,260 2,500 2.2 50 N/A −0.30
 Arg 8,910 17,970 2,700 2.0 43 N/A −0.05
 Lys 8,880 18,240 2,050 2.1 48 N/A −1.35
*

Theoretical molecular weight of the monomeric protein. The difference between the 8.8- and 8.1-kDa proteins is in the size of the polyhistidine tag. 

Apparent molecular weight (Da) as determined by laser light scattering at concentrations of 200–500 μM. Sigma is one standard deviation in Da. 

N is the apparent molecular weight divided by the monomeric molecular weight and for proteins that are a single oligomeric state, N is equal to the oligomeric state. 

§

Melting temperature in °C at 100 μM protein concentration as described in Materials and Methods. 

ΔE is the depth of the energy minima, i.e., the difference between the free energy at infinite separation minus the minimal possible energy of the tetramer. 

Hydrophobicity index of Eisenberg and McLachlan (34), determined at a concentration of 57 μM. 

**

Melting temperature in °C at 10 μM protein concentration, from ref. 8

‡‡

This mutant was soluble only with the polyhistidine tag removed, thus the lower molecular weight.