Table 2. Summary of statistics used to test the influence of growth site (phenotypic plasticity) and seed source (ecotypic variation) on leaf size and shape in Acer rubrum.
Growth site | Seed source | Growth × seed | ||||
Variable | F[1, 149] | P | F[3, 149] | P | F[3, 149] | P |
Leaf dissection | ||||||
Shape factor | 6.7 | 0.011 | 34.3 | <0.001 | 2.0 | 0.11 |
Compactness | 8.5 | 0.004 | 33.9 | <0.001 | 2.0 | 0.12 |
Perimeter ratio | 13.7 | <0.001 | 21.4 | <0.001 | 1.3 | 0.27 |
Tooth number | ||||||
Number of teeth | 21.4 | <0.001 | 40.8 | <0.001 | 2.5 | 0.06 |
Number of teeth / leaf perimeter (cm−1) | 6.8 | 0.01 | 18.1 | <0.001 | 2.0 | 0.11 |
Number of teeth / leaf area (cm−2) | 4.5 | 0.04 | 21.8 | <0.001 | 1.3 | 0.28 |
Leaf and tooth size | ||||||
Leaf area (cm2) | 0.61 | 0.44 | 0.32 | 0.81 | 1.3 | 0.26 |
Tooth area (cm2) | 2.8 | 0.10 | 0.23 | 0.88 | 2.3 | 0.08 |
Average area of a single tooth (cm2) | 0.94 | 0.33 | 15.1 | <0.001 | 4.4 | 0.006 |
Tooth area / leaf perimeter (cm) | 0.91 | 0.34 | 3.5 | 0.02 | 1.2 | 0.32 |
Tooth area / leaf area | 2.1 | 0.15 | 0.12 | 0.95 | 0.15 | 0.93 |
Note.—Variables are grouped by relatedness to leaf dissection, tooth number, or leaf and tooth size. Two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) used for all tests; ‘growth site’ and ‘seed source’ test for no differences in a leaf variable between the two sites of growth and among plants with different seed sources, respectively; ‘growth × seed’ tests for no differences in a leaf variable due to the interaction between growth site and seed source; outcomes indicating significant differences (P<0.05) are in bold.