Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Feb 28.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet. 2009 Feb 28;373(9665):739–745. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60443-8

Table 3.

Reclassification Based on Whether the Individual Does or Does not Develop Atrial Fibrillation in 10 Years.

Without echocardiographic variables With echocardiographic variables

<5% 5–15% >15% Total
Participants who do not develop atrial fibrillation
 <5% 3216 (65.3) 232 (4.7) 1 (0.02) 3449 (70.1)
 5–15% 244 (5.0) 891 (18.1) 98 (2.0) 1233 (25.1)
 >15% 0 (0.0) 68 (1.4) 172 (3.5) 240 (4.9)

 Total 3460 (70.3) 1191 (24.2) 271 (5.5) 4922 (100.0)
Participants who developed atrial fibrillation
 <5% 59 (22.7) 17 (6.5) 2 (0.8) 78 (30.0)
 5–15% 14 (5.4) 76 (29.2) 20 (7.7) 110 (42.3)
 >15% 0 (0.0) 13 (5) 59 (22.7) 72 (27.7)

 Total 73 (28.1) 106 (40.8) 81 (31.2) 260 (100.0)

Individuals in the shaded diagonal boxes did not change classification with echocardiography; those above the diagonal had improved reclassification with echocardiography; those below the diagonal echocardiography worsened reclassification.

The net reclassification improvement was 0.04 (95% CI −0.02–0.10, p=0.18). Among individuals who did not develop AF in 10 years follow-up, echocardiographic variables up-classified 331 and down-classified 312 individuals. Among those participants who developed AF, 39 were up-classified and 27 were down-classified with echocardiography.