Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 20.
Published in final edited form as: J Sch Health. 2008 Oct;78(10):523–531. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2008.00339.x

Table 2.

Overall Key TAAG Recruitment Strategies

Strategy 8A 8B Rating*
Recruitment procedure/strategy
 TAAG recruitment staff Varied by site: 1-9 staff members Varied by site: 1-9 staff members 3
 Recruitment staff training Informal meetings: AZ, CA, MD, SC Informal staff meetings: AZ, MD 2
Informal meeting with train the trainer model: MN Informal meeting with train the trainer model: MN 2
Formal staff training: None Formal staff training: CA, SC 2
 Recruitment at school registration and
  open houses
Yes: MD, MN (all schools), SC Yes (# of schools/site): AZ (5), CA (1), MN (4) 1
 Solicit input and feedback from school
  principals and liaisons
Yes: AZ, SC Yes: AZ, SC AZ 2; SC 1
 Identify school liaison to assist staff Yes: AZ (popular staff member), CA (volunteer),
 MD and SC (designated by principal)
Yes: AZ (popular staff member), CA (volunteer),
 MD and SC (designated by principal)
2
 Live in-school presentation to potential
  participants
All sites All sites 3
 Presentation group size Small groups (10-20 girls): LA, MD Small groups (10-20 girls): LA, MD 3
Class size (20-40 girls): AZ (5 schools), CA Class size (20-40 girls): AZ (5 schools) 3
Entire eighth-grade class: CA, AZ (1 school) Entire eighth-grade class: CA, AZ (1 school) 2
 Props used during presentation Consent form packet, measurement devices,
 incentive display, posters/banner; site-specific
additions—recruitment skit: LA
Additions to 8A recruitment efforts—recruitment visit
 incentive: MD; trivia game with prizes to winning team:
 CA; balloons: SC; school-approved “cool” music: CA, SC
3
 Recruitment—prize drawing SC: 1 $100 gift card per school AZ: 1 gift ($100) per school; SC: 3 gifts (valued from
 $100-$120) per school
AZ 2; SC 1
 80% recruitment goal party AZ: BBQ at 1 school; “No-Uniform” Day at another;
 SC: ice-cream sundae party at 2 schools
Dropped at 8B AZ 2; SC 1
 General measurement incentive $25-$50 range; AZ, LA = $25; SC = $26; CA = $30;
 MN = $40; MD = $50. Given before actigraph
 compliance verified
$25-$40 range; LA, SC = $25; AZ, CA, MN = $40;
 MD = $50. Given after actigraph compliance verified
3
 Fitness measure incentive $5-$20 range; CA, LA, MD = $5; SC = $10;
 AZ = $15; MN = $20
Not conducted in 8B 3
Consent form return/follow-up
 Girls complete and return assent forms
  at presentation
SC: 3 or 4 schools only SC: all schools 3
 Consent form return timeline Varied by site: 1 day to 1 week 1 day to 1 week; more stringent timeline 3
 Consent return incentive Girl: $0-$5 range; CA, MD = $0; MN = $1;
 AZ, SC = $3; LA = $5
Girl: $0-$5 range; AZ, MD = $0, MN = $1; SC = $3;
 CA, LA = $5
3
Parent: N/A Parent: SC only = $10 3
 Face-to-face participant follow-up
  by TAAG staff
Periodically; location varied by site/school
 (lunchroom, homeroom, PE classes)
Periodically; location varied by site/school (lunchroom,
 homeroom, PE classes)
2
 Follow-up by school liaison AZ, CA, SC: periodically—helpful in collecting
 straggler forms
AZ, CA, SC: periodically—helpful in collecting
 straggler forms
2
 Automated phone message reminders
  to parents
SC (4 schools only toward the end of recruitment) SC (5 schools only right before or day of recruitment
 presentation)
2
 School PA system announcements AZ, LA, MD, MN, SC Utilized more frequently than in 8A: AZ, MD, MN, SC;
 CA: daily for the week postpresentation
2
 Primary method of consent form return In-person returns to TAAG staff or school liaison:
 AZ, CA, LA, MD, SC
In-person returns to TAAG staff or school liaison:
 AZ, CA, LA, MD, SC
2
Returns via US mail: MN Returns via US mail: MN 2
 Consent form follow-up distribution Mailed: AZ, CA, MN, SC Mailed: AZ, CA, MN 2
Hand-delivered: LA, CA Hand-delivered: LA, SC 2
 Personal phone calls to parents AZ: Done by school liaisons at 3 schools; others sites:
 as needed to track down straggler forms or get
 missing information
AZ: Done by school liaisons at 3 schools; others sites:
 get as needed to track down straggler forms or
 get missing information
2
*

Rating key: 1 = not effective; 2 = moderately effective; 3 = very effective (indicates the effectiveness of this technique in recruiting eighth-grade girls, and reflects the site rating of the 8B strategy compared to the 8A strategy). This rating was provided by site representatives who were heavily involved in the recruitment process. Displayed rating is based on mode of ratings provided by sites that utilized the measure.

The general measurement incentive was given after successful completion of 2 surveys, physical activity monitor component, and height, weight, and skin fold measures, The fitness measure involved a bike test (only administered to a subsample of girls in 8A).