Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 21.
Published in final edited form as: Math Biosci Eng. 2009 Oct;6(4):873–887. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2009.6.873

Table 1.

Legend of Notation

Notation Description Estimation Units
Energy Balance Terms R Rate of energy accretion N/A kcal/day
I Rate of energy intake Time averaged estimate kcals/day
E Rate of energy expended N/A kcals/day
DIT Dietary induced thermogenesis N/A kcals/day
PA Volitional activity N/A kcals/day
RMR Resting energy requirements Livingston-Kohlstadt kcals/day
NEAT Non-exercise activity
thermogenesis
N/A kcals/day
State Variables F(t) Fat mass on day t N/A kg
FFM(t) Fat free mass on day t FFM = α1F + b kg
W Total body mass W=FFM+F kg
Parameters G Time averaged
kcals of glucose
N/A kcal
f Proportion of FFM(t) of muscle tissue available 0.30 ≤ f ≤ 0.50 N/A
cl Caloric value of kg of fat free mass 955.384 kcals/kg
cf Caloric value of kg of fat mass 7165 kcals/kg
β DIT = βI 0.04 ≤ β ≤ 1.14 N/A
m Proportion of body mass related to PA N/A kcals/kg/d
aF, aM Body mass proportionality aF = 248, aM = 293, N/A
constant in Livingston-Kohlstadt
pF, pM Exponent of body mass
in Livingston-Kohlstadt
pF = 0.4356, pM = 0.4330 N/A
yF, yM Proportion age decrease
to RMR in Livingston-Kohlstadt
yF = 5.09, yM = 5.92 N/A
A0 Initial Age A0 > 0 years
A Age A = A0 + t/365 days
a Percent of metabolic adaptation 0 ≤ a ≤ 1 N/A
e Efficiency of depositing stored energy Male: e = 0.82
Female: e = .83
N/A
N/A
α1 Slope of linear relationship
between FFM and F
Male: 1 = 0.56
Female: α1 = 0.32
N/A
N/A
b y-intercept of linear
relationship between FFM and F
b > 0, baseline
data
kg
α W = αF + b α = α1 + 1 N/A
r Proportion change in NEAT
to change in E
r = 2/3