Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 21;39(2):100–108. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.90354.2008

Table 3.

Relative Array and PCR expression of selected genes highly expressed in HCCEC compared to HCAEC and HUVEC

Accession No. Gene Name Fold Δ vs. HCAEC
Fold Δ vs. HUVEC
Taqman Assay ID
Array PCR Array PCR
NM_001792 Cadherin 2* 2.48 1.72 2.47 −1.35 Hs00169953_m1
NM_001797 Cadherin 11* 2.12 5.11 1.97 −1.16 Hs00156438_m1
NM_003277 Claudin 5 −2.16 −5.81 −2.21 −1.9 Hs00533949_s1
NM_005602 Claudin 11 5.03 25.44 4.42 2.71 Hs00194440_m1
NM_004415 Desmoplakin* 13.29 9.76 Hs00189422_m1
NM_004114 FGF 13 5.32 8.88 4.05 16.85 Hs00182807_m1
NM_013372 Gremlin 1* 19.19 22.19 Hs00171951_m1
AI380298 Syndecan 2* 10.9 7.5 8.04 4.58 Hs00299807_m1
R94644 Versican* 8.39 25.6 4.21 4.48 Hs01007937_m1
*

Array fold change in certain cases is an average because the gene had multiple probe sets called significant.

For Desmoplakin and Gremlin 1, CT values were low for human corpus cavernosum endothelial cells (HCCEC); for human coronary artery endothelial cells (HCAEC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) the amplification never reached the linear range, implying very low expression of the gene but making fold change calculations impossible.