TABLE 1.
Treatment group | Cecal contents (g) | Total bacterial no.
|
Viability of cecal bacteria
|
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Log count/cecum | Log count/g | % Viable | % Injured | % Dead | ||
Fed | 3.8 ± 0.5 a | 10.6 ± 0.1 a | 10.0 ± 0.1 a | 81.3 ± 1.7 a | 9.2 ± 0.6 a | 9.5 ± 1.3 a |
Fasted | 3.3 ± 0.3 a | 9.4 ± 0.1 b | 8.8 ± 0.1 b | 77.7 ± 3.1 a | 15.9 ± 2.6 b | 6.4 ± 1.0 b |
Torpid | 7.6 ± 0.4 b | 10.9 ± 0.1 a | 10.0 ± 0.1 a | 90.9 ± 0.9 b | 5.7 ± 0.7 a | 3.4 ± 0.2 b |
Data are means ± SEM from six, six, and four hamsters in the fed, fasted, and torpid groups, respectively. Mean values with different letters were significantly different (P < 0.05) as estimated by Tukey-Kramer's test following a one-way analysis of variance.