TABLE 4.
Comparison of copy numbers of targeted methanogen 16S rRNA genes in L-RFI and H-RFI animalsa
Organism group | No. of copies/ml
|
P | Proportion of total methanogens (%)
|
P | Amplification efficiency (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
L-RFI | H-RFI | L-RFI | H-RFI | ||||
Total methanogens | (2.12 ± 0.29) × 107 | (2.52 ± 0.29) × 107 | 0.16 | 100 | 100 | 93.55 | |
M. stadtmanae | (1.33 ± 0.18) × 106 | (2.48 ± 0.59) × 106 | 0.03 | 6.02 ± 1.16 | 11.53 ± 2.55 | 0.02 | 94.46 |
Methanobrevibacter sp. strain AbM4 | (5.69 ± 1.10) × 105 | (2.20 ± 0.59) × 106 | 0.02 | 3.73 ± 0.60 | 8.45 ± 2.16 | 0.02 | 94.30 |
Values shown are means ± standard errors. The L-RFI and H-RFI groups each contained 29 animals.