Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contemp Clin Trials. 2009 Mar 9;30(4):326–333. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2009.02.007

Table 1.

Comparison of Participant Characteristics in Two Related Trials Evaluating A Binge Eating Disorder Interventiona

Comprehensive Assessment
Phase (trial #1)
Abbreviated Assessment Phase (trial
#2)
Target Population for
Recruitment Mailingb
Women, 25 – 50 years of age Women, 25-50 years of age
Initial Screening Modified version of PHQ eating disorders
module
Modified version of PHQ eating disorders
module
Persistence of
Screening Effort
Nonrespondents to mailed survey sent a
second copy after 15 days
No second survey mailed
Incentives Provided $5 for online completion of screening
questionnaire; $50 for baseline
assessment (1-2 hrs phone interview)
No incentive for online completion of
screening questionnaire; $25 for baseline
assessment (10-15 minute pencil and paper
measure)
Determination of RCT
Eligibility
Eating Disorders Examination (EDE) and
Structured Clinical Interview for DSM
Disorders (SCID)
Eating Disorders Examination —
Questionnaire (EDE-Q) and secondary
telephone screening
a

Although instruments assessing RCT eligibility differed across the two study phases/trials, criteria were consistent across both. Samples included in this paper were limited to women between 25 and 50 years of age who reported one or more objective bulimic episode per week over the past three months.

b

self-referred men and younger (18-24 year old) women were were eligible for participation but their data is not included in this report