Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Virol. 2009 Jul 14;46(1):90–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2009.06.016

Table 2.

Comparison the two PCR methods in identifying the host species through DNA barcoding using fecal and cloacal samples

Single PCR Nested PCR
Species Order No. tested Successful PCR and Correct Species Identification Mean Specimen Similarity ± Standard Deviation (%)e Successful PCR and Correct Species Identification Mean Specimen Similarity ± Standard Deviation (%)
FECAL SAMPLES
Anas clypeata Anseriformes 3 3 100±0 3 100.0±0.1
Anas platyrhynchos Anseriformes 1 1 95.9±0 1 100±0
Ardea cinerea Ciconiiformes 1 1 100±0 1 100±0
Columba livia Columbiformes 2 1 100±0 2 100±0
Gallus gallus Galliformes 29 18 97.9±4.4 29 99.9±0.3
Numenius phaeopus Charadriiformes 1 1 100±0 1 100±0
Phalacrocorax carbo Pelecaniformes 2 1 100±0 2 100±0
Phasianus colchicus Galliformes 3 1 97.7±0 3 100±0
Charadrius leschenaultii Charadriiformes 1 0 1 99.9±0
Platalea minor Pelecaniformes 3 0 3 99.7±0.1
Rostratula benghalensis Charadriiformes 1 0 1 99.9±0
Total 47 27 47
CLOACAL SAMPLES
Anas acuta Anseriformes 4 4 100±0 4 100±0.1
Anas penelope Anseriformes 1 1 100±0 1 97.8±0.0
Anas platyrhynchos Anseriformes 1 1 99.7±0 1 100±0
Gallus gallus Galliformes 13 13 100±0 13 98.8±2.9
Muscicapa dauurica Passeriformes 1 1 100±0 1 95.9±0
Prinia gracilis Passeriformes 1 1 100±0 1 100±0
Sturnus sericeus Passeriformes 8 8 99.9±0.3 8 99.9±0.1
Tringa nebularia Charadriiformes 1 1 100±0 1 100±0
Tringa totanus Charadriiformes 3 3 100±0 3 100±0
Zosterops japonicus Passeriformes 1 1 100±0 1 100±0
Acrocephalus orientalis Passeriformes 1 0 1 100±0
Halcyon smyrnensis Coraciiformes 1 0 1 94.9±0
Hirundo rustica Passeriformes 1 0 1 100±0
Luscinia cyane Passeriformes 1 0 1 99.9±0.0
Phalacrocorax carbo Pelecaniformes 1 0 1 100±0
Pycnonotus jocosus Passeriformes 1 0 1 99.9±0
Rostratula benghalensis Charadriiformes 5 0 5 99.9±0.0
Total 45f 34 45
e

Mean and standard deviation of specimen similarity in one species group: Similarity scores (specimen similarity) are calculated from the alignment of query sequence to that of known species in the barcoding database.

f

Four of the 45 cloacal samples did not yield a specific PCR product by the above methods. The DNA extracts from these 4 specimens, were re-extracted using the Qiagen Investigator Kit. Nested PCR was done for all 4 samples.