Table 3.
Model | Method | Essentials/Non-essentials | Sensitivity | Specificity | Error | Accuracy | Reference |
iFF708 | FBA | 23/90 | 0.13 | 1 | 0.87 | 82% | 22 |
iFF708 | FBA | 91/508 | 0.31 | 0.95 | 0.69 | 85% | 6 |
iFF708 | FBA | 79-146/562-629 | 0.40-0.53 | 90-96% | NR | NR | 33 |
iND750 | FBA | 118/NR | 0.31 | NR | NR | NR | 10 |
iLL672 | FBA | NR/NR | 0.68-0.80 | 96-98% | NR | NR | 33 |
iFF708 | MOMA | 46/302 | 0.60 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 88% | 34 |
iLL672 | MOMA | NR/NR | 0.73-0.80% | NR | NR | NR | 33 |
iND750 | SA | 100/NR | 0.14 | NR | NR | NR | 7 |
Previous studies on the efficiency to identify essential metabolic genes on yeast, report different statistical parameters of confidence (Sensitivity, Specificity, Error and Accuracy columns), and commonly use a single network (Model column) and a single method (Method column) to identify essential genes. The data were obtained from the works reported in the "Reference" column. FBA: Flux-Balance Analysis; MOMA: Method of Minimization of Metabolic Adjustment; SA: Synthetic accessibility; NR: a value not reported in the cited reference.