Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 14.
Published in final edited form as: Structure. 2009 Oct 14;17(10):1398–1410. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2009.08.009

Table 1.

Structural statistics for the solution structure of IL-33

Number of structural restraints 〈SA〉* 〈SA〉water refined*
 NOE-derived distance restraints
  Total (unambiguous/ambiguous) 4693 (4661/32)
  intraresidual 1714 (1712/2)
  sequential 909 (898/11)
  medium range 423 (419/4)
  long range 1647 (1632/15)
 Dihedral restraints 245
  φ 123
  ψ 122
 Hydrogen bonds 76
Violations
 R.m.s.d from experimental restraints
  NOE distance restraints (Å) 0.0055 ± 0.0006 0.0115 ± 0.0018
  Dihedral restraints (°) 0.15 ± 0.02 0.43 ± 0. 05
 NOE distance violations
  Number > 0.1 Å 1.9 ± 0.9 13.6 ± 3.2
  Number > 0.3 Å 0 0.7 ± 1.0
 Dihedral violations
  Number > 1° 1.3 ± 0.9 13.7 ± 2.8
  Number > 2° 0 3.2 ± 1.3
R.m.s.d. from idealized geometry
 Bonds (Å) 0.00114 ± 0.00003 0.00353 ± 0.00009
 Angles (°) 0.278 ± 0.002 0.486 ± 0.010
 Impr (°) 0.149 ± 0.007 1.518 ± 0.096
Coordinate precision
 Backbone (all residues) 1.30 ± 0.27 1.36 ± 0.23
 All heavy atoms (all residues) 1.50 ± 0.20 1.54 ± 0.18
 Backbone (structured regions) 0.36 ± 0.05 0.46 ± 0.06
 All heavy atoms (structured regions) 0.74 ± 0.06 0.81 ± 0.06
Stereochemistry #
 Ramachandran plot (%) (all residues)
  Percentage in most favored regions 75.2 ± 3.0 77.2 ± 1.6
  Percentage in additionally allowed regions 23.7 ± 3.2 21.5 ± 1.7
  Percentage in generously allowed regions 0.8 ± 0.8 0.8 ± 0.7
  Percentage in disallowed regions 0.3 ± 0.6 0.6 ± 0.3
 Ramachandran plot (%) (structured regions)
  Percentage in most favored regions 82.6 ± 2.5 83.8 ± 2.0
  Percentage in additionally allowed regions 17.4 ± 2.5 16.1 ± 2.2
  Percentage in generously allowed regions 0 0.2 ± 0.4
Energies (kcal mol−1)
 ENOE 7.5 ± 1.7 32. 2 ± 10
 ECDIH 0.4 ± 0.1 2.9 ± 0.7
 Ebond 3.3 ± 0.2 31.5 ± 1.6
 Eangles 54.1 ± 0.8 165.0 ± 7.0
 Eimpr 4.4 ± 0.4 458.5 ± 60
*

〈SA〉 is an ensemble of the ten lowest energy solution structures of IL-33 (out of 100 calculated). The CNS Erepel function was used to simulate van der Waals interactions with an energy constant of 25.0 kcal mol−1Å−4 using ‘PROLSQ’ van der Waals radii. 1 kcal=4.18 kJ. For 〈SA〉 water refined, the ensemble of 〈SA〉 structures was refined in a shell of water.

Hydrogen bonds were derived from slowly exchanging amide protons and were applied as two distance restraints with bounds of 1.8–2.3 Å (H–O) and 2.8–3.3 Å (N–O).

Coordinate precision is given as the Cartesian coordinate r.m.s.d. of the ten lowest-energy structures in the NMR ensemble with respect to their mean structure for the full length IL-33 and the structured regions of IL-33 (residues 10–39, 47–56, 71–142 and 151–158).

#

Structural quality was analyzed using PROCHECK (Laskowski et al., 1996) for full length IL-33 and for the structured regions of IL-33 (residues 10–39, 47–56, 71–142 and 151–158).

NOESY derived distance restraints were used with a soft square-well potential using an energy constant of 50 kcal mol−1 Å−2. Dihedral angle restraints were applied using an energy constant of 200 kcal mol−1 rad−2. The force constants were 1000 kcal mol−1 Å−2 for bond length and 500 kcal mol−1 rad−2 for angles and improper dihedrals.