Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Cancer. 2009 Jul 1;125(1):139–145. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24328

Table 2.

Distribution of NAT2 acetylator genotypes among gastric cancer cases and controls

NAT2 genotype Cases (n = 471) Controls (n = 471) OR (95% CI)

No. %a No. %a
Rapid acetylators
NAT2*4 /*4 211 44.8 193 41.0
NAT2*4 /*12A 0 0 1 0.2
NAT2*4 /*13 0 0 4 0.9
 Total rapid acetylators 211 44.8 198 42.0 1.0 (Reference)
Intermediate acetylators
NAT2*4 /*5B 12 2.6 13 2.8
NAT2*4 /*6A 120 25.5 126 26.8
NAT2*4 /*6C 1 0.2 1 0.2
NAT2*4 /*7B 70 14.9 74 15.7
NAT2*4 /*10 0 0 1 0.2
NAT2*6A /*13 1 0.2 0 0
 Total intermediate acetylators 204 43.3 215 45.7 0.89 (0.68-1.17)b
Slow acetylators
NAT2*5B /*6A 4 0.9 3 0.6
NAT2*5B /*7B 2 0.4 2 0.4
NAT2*6A /*6A 16 3.4 22 4.7
NAT2*7B /*7B 9 1.9 5 1.1
NAT2*6 A /*7B 25 5.3 26 5.5
 Total slow acetylators 56 11.9 58 12.3 0.95 (0.77-1.17)b
NAT2 acetylators activity
Rapid 211 44.8 198 42.0 1.0 (reference)
Slow / intermediate 260 55.2 273 58.0 0.94 (0.83-1.08)c
a

(participants with genotype/total cases or controls)*100.

b

Unconditional logistic regression adjusted for gender and age.

c

Conditional logistic regression stratified by age and gender.