Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 21;114(17):3642–3651. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-223354

Table 1.

Antimicrobial activity (in ×103 CFU) of WT and Hfe-deficient macrophages

Bacterial load Hfe+/+ Hfe+/− Hfe−/−
2 h after infection 370.67 ± 22.57 364.67 ± 40.20 367.33 ± 29.37
6 h after infection 260.67 ± 15.69 245.33 ± 14.32 233.33 ± 13.66
16 h after infection 86.83 ± 3.59 55.50 ± 4.64* 41.75 ± 3.67
24 h after infection 25.36 ± 1.16 11.94 ± 0.57 10.02 ± 0.56§

WT, Hfe+/−, and Hfe−/− macrophages were challenged with S Typhimurium WT strain at a MOI of 5, and their antimicrobial activity was evaluated by enumeration of surviving bacteria at indicated times. Data were log-transformed and compared by ANOVA and shown as mean ± SEM for 5 independent experiments.

WT indicates wild-type; MOI, multiplicity of infection; and ANOVA, analysis of variance.

*

P = .002 for the comparison of WT and Hfe+/− macrophages.

P < .001 for the comparison of WT and Hfe−/− macrophages.

P < .001 for the comparison of WT and Hfe+/− macrophages.

§

P < .001 for the comparison of WT and Hfe−/− macrophages.