Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Child Dev. 2009 Sep-Oct;80(5):1448–1462. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01344.x

Table 3.

Model Parameter Estimates and Standardized Indirect Effects

States of
Mind		 Styles Substance
Use T1		 Support Negative Monitoring Substance
Use T3
States of
Mind		 -- .00 .00 .00 .02 −.03 −.04
Styles .32** -- .00 .01 −.05 .21 −.33
Substance
Use T1		 .08 (.01) −.25 (.07)** -- .00 .00 −.02 .15
Support −.01 (.01) .57 (.08) ** .02 (.08) -- .00 .00 −.08
Negative −.07 (.01) −.22 (.13) .22 (.08)* N/A -- .00 .02
Monitoring .04 (.01) .33 (.07)** −.35 (.06)** .12 (.09) −.05 (.08) -- .00
Substance
Use T3		 −.13 (.02) .07 (.10) .49 (.10)** .02 (.07) .05 (.10) −.40 (.21)** --

Note: Lower quadrant represents standardized coefficient estimates represented in Figure 2, with standard error in parentheses. Upper quadrant represents standardized indirect effects; no p values reported.

*

p < .05

**

p < .01.