Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 27.
Published in final edited form as: J Educ Psychol. 2009 Aug 1;101(3):561–576. doi: 10.1037/a0014701

Table 2.

Pretest Performance by Tutoring Condition and Difficulty Status

Tutoring condition
Difficulty status
Variable F (df) WPs (n = 42) NCs (n = 44) Control (n = 47) F (df) MD (n = 73) MDRD (n = 60)
Number combinations (2, 123), <1 0.10 (0.92) −0.12 (1.10) 0.02 (0.98) (1, 123), <1 0.11 (0.99) −0.13 (1.01)
Procedural calculations (2, 123), <1 −0.07 (0.94) −0.06 (1.05) 0.11 (1.02) (1, 123), <1 0.12 (1.00) −0.14 (0.99)
Word problems
 Find X (2, 128), <1 −0.09 (1.02) −0.02 (0.96) 0.10 (1.03) (1, 128), <1 0.06 (1.04) −0.07 (0.95)
 Number Sentences (2, 128), 1.10 −0.15 (0.99) −0.04 (1.02) 0.17 (0.98) (1, 128), 6.41* 0.23 (0.98) −0.29 (0.95)
 KeyMath (2, 127), <1 −0.06 (1.13) −0.02 (0.89) 0.07 (0.99) (1, 127), 4.91* 0.20 (1.02) −0.25 (0.92)
 Vanderbilt Story Problems (2, 128), 2.06 0.13 (1.11) −0.21 (0.84) 0.08 (1.02) (1, 128), 7.07* 0.25 (1.06) −0.30 (0.84)

Note. F values are for the main effects indicated, after controlling for other factors in the model; for number combinations (NCs) and procedural calculations, there were interactions of tutoring group and/or difficulty status with each other and/or with site. Scores in table are raw means (uncorrected). NCs and procedural calculations are factor scores derived from a combination of similar measures. KeyMath, Vanderbilt Story Problems, and Find X, however, are individual pretest variables, which have been z score standardized for comparative purposes. The Iowa was not administered at pretest because it would have produced a floor effect at that time. WPs = word problems; MD = math difficulty; MDRD = math and reading difficulty.

*

p < .05.