Table 4.
Antioxidant Intake Scorec | Change in QT, ms | 95% Confidence Interval | Change in QTc, ms | 95% Confidence Interval |
Low intake (n = 55) | 11* | 0.078, 22 | 4.1 | −4.1, 12 |
Intermediate intake (n = 83) | 2.7 | −4.2, 9.6 | 0.24 | −6.3, 6.8 |
High intake (n = 60) | 3.2 | −1.9, 8.4 | 3.9 | −0.04, 7.9 |
Pinteraction | 0.28 | 0.95 |
Abbreviations: ms, millisecond(s); QTc, heart rate-corrected QT.
P < 0.05 (2 sided).
Corresponding to a 0.059-μg/g increment of toenail arsenic concentration.
All multivariate linear regression models are adjusted for age, cigarette smoking (smoker vs. nonsmoker), pack-years of smoking, season of clinical visit, body mass index, serum C-reactive protein, serum fasting glucose, year of clinical visit, mean arterial pressure, and daily total energy intake.
To assess modification by antioxidant intake, we constructed a score representing the combined intake of vitamin C, vitamin A, and total carotene. For each nutrient, we assigned participants a score of 1–3, corresponding to their tertile of intake. The overall intake score was obtained by summing scores for individual dietary components and was partitioned into 3 categories: low (3–4), intermediate (5–7), or high (8–9).