Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun 23;20(11):1803–1812. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdp067

Table 7.

Comparison of LSMs of PRO end points over the first six cycles

PRO end points Sunitinib Interferon Difference P value
FKSI-DRS 28.81 26.38 2.43 <0.0001
FKSI 43.14 39.32 3.82 <0.0001
FACT-G total score 75.71 69.27 6.44 <0.0001
FACT-G physical well-being subscale 20.20 18.82 1.38 0.158
FACT-G social/family well-being subscale 21.71 20.12 1.59 <0.0001
FACT-G emotional well-being subscale 16.73 15.67 1.06 0.019
FACT-G functional well-being subscale 16.81 14.87 1.94 0.019
EQ-5D index (utility score) 0.723 0.674 0.049 0.022
EQ-VAS (health state hermometer score) 68.10 63.45 4.65 0.100

LSMs were estimated using the repeated measures mixed effects model controlling for the time, treatment-by-time interaction and baseline score. A higher score means better outcome (better quality of life or less symptoms).

LSM, least squares mean; PRO, Patient reported outcome; FKSI-DRS, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Kidney Symptom Index–Disease-Related Symptoms; FACT-G, Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General; EQ-5D, EQ-5D self-report questionnaire.