Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct 28;15(40):5091–5096. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5091

Table 1.

Macroscopic evaluation of gastric mucosa

Groups n Weight (gr) GML count GML area mm2
Sham 8 223.50 ± 18.40 (200-249) 0 0
Indomethacin 8 225.00 ± 13.77 (201-248) 6.25 ± 3.49 (1-11)a 21.00 ± 12.35 (1-36)b
Famotidine 5 (F5) 8 223.25 ± 13.13 (203-236) 4.12 ± 2.47 (2-8) 8.62 ± 2.97 (3-12)
Famotidine 20 (F20) 8 224.75 ± 14.78 (200-247) 2.37 ± 4.43 (0-13) 0.94 ± 2,06 (0-6)d
Vardenafil 2 (V2) 8 221.12 ± 13.27 (204-242) 4.37 ± 3.06 (0-8) 6.62 ± 5.87 (0-16)e
Vardenafil 10 (V10) 8 224.12 ± 15.16 (202-250) 1.25 ± 1.38 (0-3)cg 0.75 ± 0.88 (0-2)dg

GML: Gastric mucosal lesion. The values are presented as mean ± SD, (min-max).

a

P < 0.05,

b

P < 0.001 vs all other groups;

c

P < 0.05,

d

P < 0.001 vs group F5;

e

P < 0.05 vs group F20;

g

P < 0.05 vs group V2.