Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 12;29(32):10171–10179. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1300-09.2009

Table 1.

Number of subjects showing significant Granger causality: stop signal task (top) and resting state (bottom) time series

EFFECT
IFC PMC preSMA Caudate STN
CAUSE
    IFC 28 48 24 19
    PMC 34 37 49 50
    PreSMA 37 24 48 23
    Caudate 24 24 29 33
    STN 26 45 32 40
    IFC 2 5 5 3
    PMC 2 3 6 8
    PreSMA 3 2 4 4
    Caudate 3 2 2 6
    STN 3 8 2 11

Binomial test: n > 38 for p < 0.01 and n > 36 for p < 0.05, task data (n = 57); n > 21 for p < 0.01 and n > 19 for p < 0.05, resting state data (n = 30).