Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 21;3:1–5.

Table 1.

Results of studies of the histrelin implant for the treatment of central precocious puberty

Study Number of patients Peak stimulated LH results (mIU/ml) Radiographic findings Growth velocity SDS Adverse events
Pilot study4 11 (all girls) Baseline 1.3 ± 1.34
6 mo 0.2 ± 0.06*
9 mo 0.25 ± 0.08*
12 mo 0.28 ± 0.08*
24 mo 0.25 ± 0.08*
BA–CA:
Baseline 1.7 ± 0.5
9 mo 0.6 ± 0.4
Baseline 2.8 ± 1.7
9 mo −3.1 ± 2.2
Minor local infection (1)
Suture inserted into implant (1)
Spontaneous extrusion at 6 weeks (1)
Phase III study9 36 (33 girls)
(20 naïve)
Naïve group
Baseline 28.2 ± 20
1 mo 0.8 ± 0.4*
Pretreated group
Baseline 2.1 ± 2.1
1 mo 0.5 ± 0.3*
Δ(BA/CA)
Baseline to 12 months: Naïve group −0.08 ± 0.08*
Pretreated group
−0.09 ± 0.06*
All −0.08 ± 0.07*
Naïve group
12 mo −1.8 ± 2.5
Pretreated group
12 mo 0.6 ± 2.3
Implant site reactions (18)
Implant broken upon removal (7) Ultrasound localization needed for removal (1)
Two-year results10 31 (29 girls)
(18 naïve)
Naïve
12 mo 0.92 ± 0.58
24 mo 0.51 ± 0.33*
Pretreated group
12 mo 0.74 ± 0.50
24 mo 0.45 ± 0.35*
Δ (BA/CA)
12 to 24 months:
−0.07 ± 0.04*
12 mo −0.42 ± 2.4
24 mo −1.75 ± 3.05*
Implant site reactions (19)
Ultrasound localization needed for removal (3) Breakage upon removal (5) Scar (2 reported, 1 keloid)
*

statistically significant change from baseline (p < 0.05).

Abbreviations: BA, bone age; CA, chronological age; LH, luteinizing hormone; SDS, standard deviation score; Δ(BA/CA), change in ratio of bone age to chronological age.