Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 15.
Published in final edited form as: Transplantation. 2009 Sep 15;88(5):736–746. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181b2a0e0

Appendix A.

Studies included in meta-analysis of rates and psychosocial risk factors for nonadherence to the medical regimen after pediatric organ transplantation.a

Study first author, year (and first author, year of related publications) Country Age rangeb Areas of nonadherence examined Examined psychosocial variables that were included in the meta-analysis
Immuno. meds. Clinic appts. Tests Diet Exercise Alcohol use Illicit drug usec Tobacco use Global nonadher.
Kidney transplant studies
Rovelli, 1989 (Schweizer, 1990; Swanson, 1991) USA < 20 X
Ettinger, 1991, pre-adolescent cohort (Ettinger, 1991a, 1991b) USA < 13 X X
Ettinger, 1991, adolescent cohort (Ettinger, 1991a, 1991b) USA 13 – 21 X X
McBride, 1991 USA Not provided X
Foulkes, 1993 (Fennell, 1993; Foulkes, 1995) USA 6 – 21 X X
Morgenstern, 1994 USA 2.5 – 19 X
Sharma, 1994 USA 0.75 – 14 X
Meyers, 1995 South Africa 6.5 – 15 X X X
Blowey, 1996 (Blowey, 1997) Canada 12.5 – 17.9 X X
Conley, 1996 USA ≤ 18 X X
Davis, 1996 USA 5 – 18 X
Iitaka, 1996 Japan 5 – 15 X
Meyers, 1996 South Africa 2.5 – 20.8 X
Fennell, 2001 (Tucker, 2001, Tucker, 2002) USA 6 – 20 X
Fernandez de Preliasco, 2002 Argentina 9 – 22 X
Fukunishi, 2002 Japan 0 – 19 X
Rizvi, 2002 Pakistan 6 – 17 X
Penkower, 2003 USA 13 – 18 X X X X
Shaw et al., 2003, pre-adolescent cohort (Sarwal, 2003) USA < 11 X X
Shaw et al., 2003, adolescent cohort USA ≥ 11 X X
Gerson, 2004 USA 2.4 – 20.9 X
Feinstein, 2005 Israel 1.7 – 23.0 X X
Berber, 2006 Turkey 11 – 17 X
Remorino, 2006 UK 17 – 20 X X
Abeyeskera, 2007 Sri Lanka 8 – 16 X X
Chisholm, 2007 USA < 5 X
Shellmer, 2007 USA 8 – 19 X
Takemoto, 2007 USA 0 – 18 X
Wu, 2008 China 12 – 17 X X
Vasudevan, 2008 India < 18 X
Liver Transplant Studies
Kennard, 1990 USA 0.25 – 12.5 X
Lurie, 2000 (Shemesh, 2000) USA 13 – 18 X
Fukunishi, 2002 Japan 0 – 19 X
Kelly, 2002, pre-adolescent cohort (Kelly, 2005, 2006) UK ≤ 10 X X
Kelly, 2002, adolescent cohort (Kelly, 2005, 2006) UK > 10 X X
Avitzur, 2004 Canada 0.5 – 17.3 X
Falkenstein, 2004 USA Not provided X
Rumbo, 2004 USA 3 – 20 X
Shemesh, 2004 (Shemesh, 2007, Emre, 2006) USA 2 – 21 X X
Berquist, 2006 USA 12 – 21 X X
Annunziato, 2007 USA ≥ 12 X
Bueno, 2007 Spain 0.42 – 15 X
Fredericks, 2007 USA 2.33 – 16 X X X
Berquist, 2008 USA 12 – 21 X X X X X
Fredericks, 2008 USA 12 – 17.9 X X X
Shemesh, 2008 USA 8 – 21 X
Stuber, 2008 USA < 21 X
Venkat, 2008 USA Not provided X
Heart Transplant Studies
Baum, 1991 USA 0.25 – 18.9 X X
Douglas, 1993 (Addonizio, 1993) USA ≤ 18 X X X
Serrano-Ikkes, 1998 UK Not provided X X X X
Flippen, 2000 USA 0 – 18 X
Chartrand, 2001 Canada 0.83 – 19 X
Ringewald, 2001 USA Not provided X X
Farley, 2005 (Farley, 2007) USA 1 – 18 X X X X
Stilley, 2005 (Stilley, 2006) USA < 21 X X X X X X X
Lung/Heart-Lung Transplant Studies
Whitehead, 1993 (Serrano-Ikkes, 1998) UK 3.6 – 18.6 X X X
Durst, 2001 USA 11 – 17 X X
Mixed Samples of Transplant Recipients
Maikranz, 2006 (Dreyer, 2006; Maikranz, 2007) USA 7 – 18
Wray, 2006 UK 12.3 – 24.9 X X X X X
Simons, 2007 (Simons, 2008) USA 11 – 21 X X
a

Each row in this table describes an independent study of a given transplant recipient cohort. A few investigations included more than one cohort (e.g., Fukunishi, 2002 studied a kidney recipient cohort and a liver recipient cohort). Each study is listed under each type of transplantation for which it contributed a separate, independent sample.

b

The age range describes transplant recipients at the inception of the follow-up period examined in a given investigation. For some studies, this was the age at transplant (e.g., when studies examined adherence during the entire period since transplant); for other studies, it was the age at which the study began to monitor patients’ adherence (e.g., when studies examined adherence during a specific time period at some point during the years post-transplant). In a few studies no age range was provided, although the authors typically provided other descriptive information (e.g., mean or median age), indicating that they were studying pediatric recipients.

c

Includes studies that do not explicitly note if alcohol use was included or excluded from the substances examined.