Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Oct 28.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Psychopathol. 2009 Spring;21(2):417–439. doi: 10.1017/S0954579409000236

Table 3. Correlations among study variables.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1. Treatment group
2. Child gender −.01
3. Child ethnicity .01 −.05
4. Maternal CES-D, age 2 .02 .04 .01
5. Maternal CES-D, age 3 −.08 −.06 −.01 .42*
6. Eyeberg problem, age 2 −.01 .00 .03 .13* .12*
7. Eyeberg problem, age 3 −.04 .07 −.04 .20* .37* .43*
8. Eyeberg problem, age 4 −.09* .05 −.04 .17* .28* .35* .65*
9. Externalizing age 2 .02 .06 −.03 .16* .23* .37* .43* .37*
10. Extemalizing age 3 −.02 .08* −.03 .26* .40* .29* .66* .53* .59*
11. Extemalizing age 4 −.10* .09* −.02 .20* .33* .24* .51* .69* .49* .69*
12. Internalizing age 2 .03 −.04 .12* .25* .24* .18* .22* .18* .52* .37* .29*
13. lnternalizing age 3 −.01 −.06 .08 .29* .40* .14* .39* .34* .34* .59* .47* .63*
14. lnternalizing age 4 −.08* −.02 .06 .21* .33* .10* .30* .47* .29* .44* .65* .50* .67*
*

p < .05.