Skip to main content
. 2009 Nov 4;97(9):2399–2408. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.018

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Effects of single repressive effects of CWO on the period in DD. (a and b) Summary of how the period and peak levels of CLK-CYC and per mRNA react in simulations where the absolute value of a single repressive regulatory weight of CWO is increased (Δ) or decreased (∇) by 10% in DD. Neither CLK-CYC nor the period is affected by similar perturbations of the repressive actions of CWO on tim. (c) Bar graph from an experiment where |λCWO,perwt| is increased (|λCWO,perΔ|) or decreased (|λCWO,per|) by 10% in DD, leading to higher (ΔxC/CΔ(tper)>0 and ΔxCWOΔ(tper)>0) and lower (ΔxC/C(tper)<0 and ΔxCWO(tper)<0) levels of CLK-CYC and CWO, respectively. The symbol tper refers to ZT at the peak of per. In the case of λCWO,perΔ, the positive transcriptional signal for per outweighs the negative one (ΔxC/CΔ(tper)λC/C,perwt>ΔxCWOΔ(tper)|λCWO,perΔ|). In the case of λCWO,per, the positive transcriptional signal for per is smaller than the negative one (ΔxC/C(tper)λC/C,perwt<ΔxCWO(tper)|λCWO,per|). (d) Response of the period to the titration of λper, PER. Notice the apparent linear relation in the interval λper, PER ∈ [0.0069, 0.0123]; y = 2 × 10-4 × x + 0.0029 (norm of residuals = 2.7312 × 10-4). (e) Based on the data plotted in d, and Plots of log(X) versus period, where X denotes the level of CLK-CYC (black), per (blue), or CWO (orange). The arrows in d and e indicate the wt model.