Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 31;297(4):L706–L714. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.90598.2008

Table 1.

Microvascular and macrovascular pulmonary endothelial cells display contrasting migratory behavior

DMEM 10% FBS VEGF ET-1 S-1-P PAR1-AP PAR2-AP
RPMVEC
    Collagen 1.0±0.3 44.6±9.9 0.7±0.4 1.1±0.1 0.8±0.8
    Fibronectin 11.1±2.3 52.4±8.6* 9.4±4.3 9.1±6.3 9.7±3.5
RPAEC
    Collagen 19.5±3.0 100.3±1.2* 38.3±3.3* 23.4±3.7 45.9±1.4* 66.1±11.4* 53.3±4.0*
    Fibronectin 21.9±2.1 105.9±3.4* 40.8±5.4* 23.9±3.2 54.9±4.6* 57.9±3.5* 59.9±7.0*

Values are mean cells per high-powered field ± SD, n = 3. Rat pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (RPMVEC) did not migrate in response to classic endothelial cell agonists: VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor, 100 ng/ml); basic fibroblast growth factor (100 ng/ml); ET-1 (endothelin-1, 10−7 mol/l); S-1-P (sphingosine-1-phosphate, 10−6 mol/l). In contrast, rat pulmonary artery endothelial cells (RPAEC) migrated with classic agonists compared with DMEM. Migration was insensitive to the extracellular matrix coating [agonist concentrations same as above; protease-activated receptor 1 agonist peptide (PAR1-AP) (SFLLRN, 10−4 mol/l); PAR2-AP (SLIGRL, 10−4 mol/l].

*

P < 0.05 vs. DMEM.