Skip to main content
. 2009 Oct;126(4):1889–1905. doi: 10.1121/1.3203996

Table 3.

Same as Table 1 but for the N0Sπ interaural condition. All r2 values were significant (p<0.05).

S Overall Stimulus set Per stimulus set P(Y∣W)
ES∕N0 d β d β r122 rmax2
S1 0 0.78 0.91 E1F1 1.10 0.57 0.93 0.97
        E1F2 0.66 0.97 0.93 0.96
S2 −10 0.97 1.10 E1F1 0.85 1.35 0.90 0.95
        E1F2 1.09 0.96 0.94 0.97
S3 −17 1.01 0.99 E1F1 0.94 1.11 0.89 0.94
        E1F2 1.06 0.92 0.86 0.92
S4 −1 0.93 1.00 E1F1 0.92 0.85 0.90 0.95
        E1F2 0.79 1.03 0.93 0.97
S5 −16.5 0.91 1.02 E1F1 0.90 1.24 0.92 0.96
        E1F2 1.09 1.11 0.92 0.96
S6 −10 0.96 1.06 E1F1 0.87 0.95 0.89 0.95
        E1F2 1.08 0.96 0.87 0.93
Savg −9.08 0.92 1.01 E1F1 0.89 1.00 0.98 0.99
        E1F2 0.96 0.99 0.97 0.98