. 2009 Oct;126(4):1906–1925. doi: 10.1121/1.3206583

Table 4.

Correlations between model decision variables in response to reproducible T+N stimuli under the N₀S_π condition are shown in terms of r². Here, models were tested at the lowest subject threshold from each study; thus each model was run at an E_S∕N₀ of 1 dB for Study 1, −6.2 dB for the 100-Hz bandwidth condition of Study 2, −2.2 dB for the 2900-Hz bandwidth condition of Study 2, and −17 dB for all stimulus sets in Study 3. Model abbreviations are the same as in Fig. 8 and Sec. 3B1.

Model comparison	Study 1	Study 2		Study 3
Model comparison	115 Hz	100 Hz	2900 Hz	E₁F₁	E₂F₂	E₂F₁	E₁F₂
EN-Wav	0.30^a	0.43^a	0.30^a	0.05	0.15	0.08	0.01
EN-Xav	0.30^a	0.43^a	0.32^a	0.01	0.12	0.34^a	0.01
EN-FCn	0.23^a	0.12	0.08	0.00	0.04	0.04	0.00
EN-BR	0.06	0.20^a	0.10	0.04	0.01	0.01	0.01
Wav-Xav	1.00^a	1.00^a	0.78^a	0.93^a	1.00^a	0.83^a	1.00^a
Wav-FCn	0.07	0.01	0.03	0.01	0.14	0.03	0.15
Wav-BR	0.18^a	0.42^a	0.29^a	0.14	0.52^a	0.56^a	0.39^a
Xav-FCn	0.08	0.01	0.02	0.03	0.13	0.01	0.15
Xav-BR	0.16^a	0.42^a	0.18^a	0.11	0.52^a	0.35^a	0.39^a
FCn-BR	0.05	0.00	0.01	0.05	0.07	0.11	0.00

p<0.05.