Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aggress Behav. 2009 Nov–Dec;35(6):437–452. doi: 10.1002/ab.20319

TABLE IV.

Bivariate Longitudinal Model-Fitting Results for Reactive and Proactive Aggression, at Ages 9–10 and 11–14 Years

Overall fit
Model difference test
Model no. −2LL DF AIC BIC Compared to model no. Δχ2 Δdf P
Reactive aggression
1a Saturated model 5,372.83 2,043 1,286.83 −3,889.75
1b Cholesky 5,437.94 2,091 1,255.94 −4,011.70 1a 65.11 48 .051
1c Cholesky: equate parameters in males and females 5,445.84 2,100 1,245.84 −4,036.72 1a 73.01 57 .08
Proactive aggression
2a Saturated model 5,523.78 2,043 1,437.78 −3,814.27
2b Cholesky 5,576.52 2,091 1,394.52 −3,942.41 2a 52.74 48 .30
2c Cholesky: equate parameters in males and females 5,596.74 2,100 1,396.74 −3,961.27 2a 72.96 57 .08

−2LL, −2(log-likelihood); AIC, Akaike’s Information Criterion; BIC, Bayesian Information Criterion.