Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1158:205–214. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2008.03758.x

Table 3.

Summary of the prediction performance under different feature and weight combinations. Winning prediction scores from the competition are shown as reference.

Method AUC precision - recall AUC ROC
DREAM2 best performer #1 0.7210 0.8475
DREAM2 best performer #2 0.6929 0.8525
Our DREAM2 submission 0.6751 0.8346
Equal weights 0.7430 0.8783
1/p-value weights 0.7738 0.8804
As in Figure 3 0.8047 0.9100
As in Figure 8 0.8449 0.9227