Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: Med Care. 2008 Sep;46(9 Suppl 1):S36–S43. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31817c60ea

Table 3.

Comparison and intervention groups results for main outcome variables

Comparison (N=177) Intervention (N=142) P value*

n % n %
Dr talked about:

CRC screening 50 29.6 71 54.2 .04
FOBT 21 11.9 25 19.2 .21
Sigmoidoscopy 8 4.6 10 7.6 .29
Colonoscopy 43 25.3 67 51.2 .04

Dr. Recommended:

CRC screening 38 23.0 64 49.2 .02
FOBT
11 6.3 15 11.6 .25
Sigmoidoscopy 5 2.9 3 2.3 .77
colonoscopy 30 18.1 56 43.4 .01

Participants not currently up to date on CRC screening plan to:

Get screened 23 43.4 45 91.8 .01
To do FOBT 12 22.2 17 36.2 .18
Get a sigmoidoscopy 0 0.0 1 2.1 .37
Get a colonoscopy 16 30.8 31 66.0 .07

All participants plan to:

Get screened 88 50.6 121 91.7 .003
To do FOBT 49 27.7 48 36.9 .35
Get a sigmoidoscopy 5 2.9 6 4.6 .81
Get a colonoscopy 58 33.1 94 72.3 .003
*

p-values from the GLIMMIX mixed model

footnote: The totals for Dr. talked about and recommended “CRC screening”, and participants plan to “Get screened” include a participant only once. The participant had the opportunity to check more than one screening test for all four questions so that these do not necessarily add up to the total.