Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009 Mar 31;37(3):219–227. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2009.01.002

Table 2.

Participant Characteristics for both Training Conditions and Total Sample.

Variables Low Fidelity (n = 74) High Fidelity (n = 73) Total (N = 147)
Age M (SD) 47(9.2) 48(10.0) 47(9.6)
Gender n (%)1
 Male 30(40.5%) 25(35.2%) 55(37.9%)
 Female 44(59.5%) 46(64.8%) 90(62.1%)
Race/Ethnicity n (%)
 African American 17(23.0%) 12(16.4%) 29(19.7%)
 Asian/Pacific Islander 0(0%) 1(1.4%) 1(.7%)
 Caucasian 44(59.5%) 52(71.2%) 98(65.3%)
 Hispanic/Latino 7(9.5%) 5(6.8%) 12(8.2%)
 Other 6(8.1%) 3(4.1%) 9(6.1%)
Education n (%)2
 High School Diploma/GED 16(21.6%) 13(18.1%) 29(19.9%)
 Associates Degree 18(24.3%) 9(12.5%) 27(18.5%)
 Bachelors Degree 13(17.6%) 15(20.8%) 28(19.2%)
 Post-Graduate Degree 27(36.5%) 35(48.6%) 62(42.5%)
SUD Recovery n (%)3
 Yes 47(63.5%) 52(72.2%) 99(67.8%)
 No 27(36.5%) 20(27.8%) 47(32.2%)
Familiar with CBT n (%)
 Yes 65(87.8%) 65(89.0%) 130(88.4%)
 No 9(12.2%) 8(11.0%) 17(11.6%)
Primary Work Setting n (%)
 Outpatient 45(60.8%) 48(65.8%) 93(63.3%)
 Controlled 29(39.2%) 25(34.2%) 54(36.7%)

Note. Participants in the two training conditions did not differ significantly on any of the above pre-training demographic characteristics.

1

N = 145

2

N = 146

3

N = 146