Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Mammal. 2007 Apr 1;88(2):360–370. doi: 10.1644/05-MAMM-A-377R1.1

TABLE 4.

Sample size (SS), sample size per web (SW; WI = web I, WII = web II, WIII = web III), allelic richness (AR), observed (HO) and expected (HE) heterozygosity, FIS, FST, and relatedness (Rel.) for each the 10 groups used to test for the effects of sample size.

Group no. SS SW AR HO HE Fis Fst Rel.
1 55 24 WI 0.836 0.851 0.017 0.017 0.017 0.017
10 WII
21 WIII
2 110 41 WI 8.973 0.811 0.852 0.048 0.017 0.032
23 WII
46 WIII
3 165 58 WI 8.838 0.800 0.845 0.053 0.016 0.031
37 WII
70 WIII
4 220 71 WI 8.980 0.808 0.846 0.044 0.014 0.026
69 WII
80 WIII
5 275 84 WI 8.847 0.794 0.843 0.058 0.014 0.026
91 WII
100 WIII
6 330 100 WI 8.781 0.795 0.839 0.053 0.014 0.025
112 WII
118 WIII
7 385 118 WI 8.793 0.795 0.839 0.053 0.012 0.023
143 WII
124 WIII
8 440 137 WI 8.783 0.797 0.841 0.053 0.011 0.021
169 WII
134 WIII
9 495 163 WI 8.765 0.800 0.840 0.048 0.011 0.021
184 WII
148 WIII
10 549 172 WI 8.763 0.798 0.836 0.046 0.011 0.021
211 WII
166 WIII