Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 May 8;2(3):237–244. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.841056

Table 2.

Predicting Coronary Vasomotor Dysfunction

Test N % (+) Sensitivity (95% CI) Specificity (95% CI) NPV (95% CI) PPV (95% CI)
Exercise Echocardiogram 99 40.4 38(26–51) 55(38–71) 36(24–49) 58(41–73)
Dobutamine Echocardiogram 21 33.3 29(8–58) 57(18–90) 29(8–58) 57(18–90)
Exercise SPECT 131 38.2 40(29–51) 65(49–78) 38(28–50) 66(51–79)
Vasodilator SPECT 64 50.0 51(35–68) 52(31–72) 41(24–59) 63(44–79)
Vasodilator PET 33 36.4 35(16–57) 60(26–88) 29(11–52) 67(35–90)
All imaging 365 41.4 41(34–47) 57(49–66) 36(30–43) 62(54–70)
Exercise ECG 242 16.1 18(12–25) 80(71–88) 41(33–48) 69(52–83)
All imaging + ECG 365 6.3 6(3–10) 90(83–94) 37(32–43) 61(39–80)