Table 3.

Multiple regression models for consonant accuracy values in different vocalic environments plotted on y-axis in Figure 3. Significant p-values are in bold.

1) Model for Cantonese:		F (2,32) = 11.01, R2 = 0.41, p < 0.001
Coefficient for:	Estimate	Std. Error	t-value	p-value
Intercept	99.8	9.28	10.76	<.001
Log freq of CV in Cantonese	3.16	1.95	1.623	0.1
Ave fr rank, other 3 lgs.	−0.18	0.05	−3.66	<.001
2) Model for English:		F (2,53) = 23.56, R2 = 0.58, p < 0.001
Coefficient for:	Estimate	Std. Error	t-value	p-value
Intercept	158.54	15.15	10.45	< 0.001
Log freq of CV in English	14.31	2.47	5.79	< 0.001
Ave fr rank, other 3 lgs.	−0.09	0.07	−1.22	0.226
3) Model for Greek:		F (2,55) = 9.87, R2 = 0.26,p < 0.001
Coefficient for:	Estimate	Std. Error	t-value	p-value
Intercept	86.23	7.83	11.01	< 0.001
Log freq of CV in Greek	0.91	1.31	0.69	0.49
Ave fr rank, other 3 lgs.	−0.16	0.04	−3.44	0.001
4) Model for Japanese:		F (2,46) = 3.37, R2 = 0.13,p = 0.04
Coefficient for:	Estimate	Std. Error	t-value	p-value
Intercept	76.93	10.20	7.54	< 0.001
Log freq of CV in Japanese	1.86	2.21	0.84	0.40
Ave fr rank, other 3 lgs.	−0.12	0.07	−1.73	0.09