Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2009 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: Struct Equ Modeling. 2008 Oct 1;15(4):676–704. doi: 10.1080/10705510802339080

Table 3.

Results of piecewise growth model fitted to IRT scores calculated under the assumption of no DIF and to IRT scores accounting for DIF.

Assuming no DIF Accounting for DIF
Parameter Estimate SE p Estimate SE p
Latent intercept factor
 Intercept .335 .053 < .0001 .337 .052 < .0001
 Study effect -.457 .058 < .0001 -.445 .057 < .0001
 Gender effect -.089 .049 .0679 -.086 .047 .0709
 Parent alcoholism effect .167 .054 .0021 .165 .053 .0020
 Residual variance .402 .025 < .0001 .386 .024 < .0001
First latent slope factor (age 2-7)
 Intercept .101 .036 .0048 .107 .035 .0025
 Gender effect .043 .031 .1745 .039 .031 .2128
 Parent alcoholism effect -.010 .028 .7151 -.011 .027 .6862
 Residual variance .000* .000*
Second latent slope factor (age 7-17)
 Intercept -.041 .016 .0131 -.038 .016 .0178
 Study effect .025 .017 .1357 .031 .017 .0601
 Gender effect -.041 .012 .0010 -.042 .012 .0007
 Parent alcoholism effect .022 .013 .0889 .023 .013 .0774
 Residual variance .002 .001 .0320 .002 .001 .0286

Note. N = 1026.

*

This parameter estimate was constrained to zero to arrive at proper solution.