Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Affect Disord. 2009 Jan 8;116(1-2):80–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.11.008

Table 2.

Comparison of the Persistent & Transient Models: Goodness of Fit of Overall Model & Multiple R2 for Platelet Outcomes.

Goodness of Fit Statistics Persistent Model Transient Model
AIC 226.27 345.73
CFI 0.973 0.830

Variance in Platelet Outcomes Accounted for by the Model, R2
P-Selectin Variable Persistent Model Transient Model

Y1 Reactivity 90% 53%
Y2 Reactivity 64% 41%
Y3 Reactivity 62% 59%
Y1 Recovery 70% 39%
Y2 Recovery 57% 22%
Y3 Recovery 33% 40%

Note: AIC = Akaike’s Information Criterion; lower values indicate better model fit (Akaike, 1974). CFI = Yuan-Bentler Corrected Comparative Fit Index; values above 0.95 are generally considered to exhibit good fit (Bentler and Yuan, 1999, Hu and Bentler, 1999). Y1 = Year 1, Y2= Year 2, Y3 = Year 3.