TABLE 3.
Consensus B reference amino acid | Position | Amino acid change | Mutation prevalence (%) |
Selection indexc |
NNRTI index/NRTI index ratio | Presence of mutation on expert list fromd: |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RTI naïve (n = 12,730) | NRTI (n = 4,598) | NNRTI (n = 8,367)b | NRTI | NNRTI | H | A | R | I | L | ||||
I | 94 | L | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 14 | 5 | |||||
A | 98 | G | 0.20 | 2.1 | 8.5 | 10 | 4.1 | 0.4 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
L | 100 | I | 0.01 | 0.02 | 6.6 | 1.0 | 303 | 303 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
K | 101 | E | 0.1 | 0.4 | 8.5 | 3.8 | 19 | 5 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
P | 0 | 0 | 2.0 | 1.0 | 93 | 93 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
H | 0 | 0.09 | 1.9 | 4.0 | 21 | 5 | √ | ||||||
N | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 11 | 4 | √ | √ | |||||
K | 102 | N | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.5 | 1.5 | 12 | 8 | |||||
K | 103 | N | 0.4 | 0.4 | 43 | 1.0 | 121 | 121 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
S | 0.01 | 0.02 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 49 | 49 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
H | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 8.7 | 9 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
T | 0.02 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 0.8 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
S | 105 | T | 0 | 0.04 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 15 | 15 | |||||
V | 106 | A | 0.01 | 0.02 | 2.7 | 1.0 | 124 | 124 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
M | 0 | 0 | 2.2 | 1.0 | 101 | 101 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
E | 138 | Q | 0.01 | 0.1 | 1.0 | 6.2 | 7.6 | 1 | |||||
T | 139 | R | 0.06 | 0.1 | 0.9 | 1.7 | 9.0 | 5 | |||||
I | 178 | F | 0 | 0.04 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 10 | 10 | |||||
V | 179 | F | 0 | 0 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 22 | 22 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
Y | 181 | C | 0.08 | 0.3 | 27 | 3.6 | 90 | 25 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
I | 0.01 | 0 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 56 | 56 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
V | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | 1.0 | 30 | 30 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
Y | 188 | L | 0.07 | 0.09 | 6.5 | 1.4 | 59 | 42 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
C | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 30 | 30 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
H | 0.01 | 0.02 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 25 | 25 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
G | 190 | A | 0.04 | 0.09 | 20 | 2.2 | 180 | 81 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
S | 0 | 0 | 3.5 | 1.0 | 350 | 350 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ | ||
E | 0.01 | 0 | 0.6 | 1.0 | 33 | 33 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
Q | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 16 | 16 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
C | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 13 | 13 | √ | √ | √ | √ | |||
H | 221 | Y | 0.2 | 0.7 | 8.6 | 4.4 | 12 | 3 | √ | ||||
C | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 12 | 12 | |||||||
K | 223 | T | 0.02 | 0.07 | 1.1 | 2.8 | 16 | 6 | |||||
P | 225 | H | 0.01 | 0.02 | 3.7 | 1.0 | 80 | 80 | √ | √ | √ | √ | √ |
F | 227 | L | 0.05 | 0.2 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 20 | 6 | √ | √ | √ | ||
Y | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 14 | 14 | √ | ||||||
M | 230 | L | 0.02 | 0.1 | 1.3 | 5.4 | 9.9 | 2 | √ | √ | √ | ||
Y | 232 | H | 0.02 | 0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 20 | 20 | |||||
L | 234 | I | 0.01 | 0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 21 | 21 | √ | √ | |||
P | 236 | L | 0.03 | 0.1 | 0.3 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 0.9 | √ | √ | √ | ||
D | 237 | E | 0.1 | 0.3 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 4.9 | 2 | |||||
K | 238 | T | 0.05 | 0.2 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 18 | 6 | √ | √ | √ | ||
N | 0.03 | 0.08 | 0.7 | 2.5 | 6.4 | 3 | √ | ||||||
V | 241 | M | 0 | 0 | 0.3 | 1.0 | 20 | 20 | |||||
Q | 242 | L | 0.02 | 0.02 | 0.5 | 1.0 | 12 | 12 | |||||
Y | 318 | F | 0.1 | 0.1 | 1.8 | 1.4 | 9.4 | 7 | √ | √ | √ |
Nonpolymorphic NNRTI-selected mutations identified in the current analysis that were not identified in our 2005 analysis (26) are shown in boldface type.
A total of 7,312 of 8,367 individuals also received NRTIs.
The NRTI selection index is the ratio of the prevalence of the mutation in NRTI-treated but NNRTI-naïve patients to the prevalence of the mutation in RTI-naïve patients. The NNRTI selection index is the ratio of the prevalence of the mutation in NNRTI-treated patients to the prevalence of the mutation in NRTI-treated patients.
A, ANRS; H, HIVDB; I, IAS-USA; L, Los Alamos National Laboratory; R, Rega. A checkmark indicates that the mutation is present on the expert list indicated.