Skip to main content
. 2009 Sep 9;83(22):11416–11420. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01057-09

TABLE 1.

Best fits for Q(m), found using the least-square fitting of log10 Plysa

m Q(m)
1 0.0038 ± 0.0012
2 0.6960 ± 0.0408
3 0.9886 ± 0.0769
4 0.9886 ± 0.0537
5 0.9886 ± 0.0487
6 0.9886 ± 0.0487
7 0.9886 ± 0.0487
8 0.9886 ± 0.0487
9 0.9886 ± 0.0487
a

The Q(0) value of 0 and the Q(m≥10) value of 1 were kept fixed. There are no error bars for the data points in Kourilsky's paper, so we determined error bars (which indicate 95% intervals) for the Q(m) fit by redoing the fit 100 times, each time randomly perturbing the data points by up to ±10% (uniformly distributed).