Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 21;14(43):6704–6710. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.6704

Table 4.

Comparison of LS and BS in relation to various patient characteristics

LS (median) BS (median)
Group Patients 2.30 ± 1.18 (2) 2.26 ± 0.83 (2.5)
Control group 0.77 ± 0.57 (1)  1.47 ± 0.73 (1)
P 0.001  0.001
Age r 0.391 -0.078
P 0.005  0.592
History of gastric complaints Positive 2.36 ± 1.43 (3)  2.09 ± 0.83 (2)
Negative 2.28 ± 1.12 (2)  2.31 ± 0.83 (3)
P 0.809  0.4
Smoking Yes 2.08 ± 1.29 (2)  2.24 ± 0.88 (3)
No 2.52 ± 1.04 (2)  2.28 ± 0.79 (2)
P 0.234  0.949
Food intake On full stomach 2.36 ± 1.17 (2)  2.27 ± 0.80 (2)
On empty stomach 2.17 ± 1.24 (2)  2.23 ± 0.90 (3)
P 0.576  0.964
H pylori Positive 2.08 ± 1.19 (2)  2.32 ± 0.75 (2)
Negative 2.52 ± 1.15 (2)  2 20 ± 0.91 (3)
P 0.204  0.743
Duration of exposure r 0.14  0.099
P 0.332  0.492
Total drug dose (as multiples of maximum daily dose) r 0.353  0.219
P 0.012  0.127
Ingested drug Acetaminophen only 1.89 ± 1.18 (2)  1.94 ± 0.87 (2)
NSAID only 2.54 ± 1.21 (3)  2.58 ± 0.70 (3)
P 0.086  0.013
Multiple NSAIDs Yes 3.40 ± 0.70 (3.5)  2.50 ± 0.85 (3)
No 2.02 ± 1.12 (2)  2.20 ± 0.82 (2)
P 0.001  0.256

Analyses performed with Mann Whitney U test. r: Spearman’s rank correlation test.