Skip to main content
. 2008 Nov 14;14(42):6551–6559. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.6551

Table 1.

Comparison of different pathological indexes [M (QR)]

Indexes Sham-operated group
Model control group
Baicalin treated group
Octreotide treated group
3 h 6 h 12 h 3 h 6 h 12 h 3 h 6 h 12 h 3 h 6 h 12 h
Pathological score of liver 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.01 3.01 3.01 1.01 2.01 2.01c 2.01 2.01 2.01c
(0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (1.0) (1.0) (0.25) (2.0) (2.0) (2.0) (2.0) (2.0) (1.0)
Pathological score of pancreas 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.01 9.01 10.51 7.01 7.01 9.01d 7.01 6.01d 8.01d
(1.0) (1.0) (1.0) (2.0) (3.0) (1.5) (1.5) (3.0) (4.0) (2.0) (2.0) (2.0)
Bax 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0ac 0.0 0.0 0.0a 0.0b
(0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (1.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.5) (1.0) (0.0) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0)
Bcl-2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0a 3.0a 0.0a 0.0ae 0.0c 0.0c 0.0c 0.0c 0.0c
(0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (1.0) (2.5) (2.0) (1.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (0.0)
Caspase-3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0a 0.0a 0.0a 0.0b 0.0b 1.0bc 1.0a 0.0a 0.0a
(0.0) (0.0) (0.0) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0) (1.0)
Apoptosis indexes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02ad 0.00 0.00 0.02ac 0.00ac
(0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.00) (0.10) (0.00) (0.04) (0.04) (0.06)
1

P < 0.001, vs sham-operated group.

a

P < 0.05,

b

P < 0.01, vs sham-operated group;

c

P < 0.05,

d

P < 0.01, vs model control group;

e

P < 0.05, vs octreotide treated group.