Skip to main content
. 2009 Feb 18;136(5):1229–1236. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2425

Table 4.

Univariate and Multivariable Analyses Comparing 7-Day Point Prevalence of Abstinence From Smoking Between Study and Control Groups

Follow-up Evaluation* Unadjusted
Adjusted
OR (95% CI) p Value N OR (95% CI) p Value N
Using intent-to-treat design
    1 mo 1.13 (0.74–1.72) 0.58 95/990 1.16 (0.76–1.77) 0.50 95/986
    3 mo 1.06 (0.73–1.53) 0.76 131/990 1.13 (0.78–1.64) 0.53 129/986
    6 mo 0.99 (0.70–1.40) 0.95 151/990 0.99 (0.68–1.42) 0.95 150/986
    12 mo 0.93 (0.65–1.32) 0.67 143/990 0.90 (0.62–1.31) 0.59 141/986
Not using intent-to-treat design
    1 mo 1.09 (0.71–1.69) 0.69 95/722 1.13 (0.73–1.74) 0.59 95/719
    3 mo 1.03 (0.71–1.51) 0.87 131/707 1.10 (0.75–1.63) 0.61 129/703
    6 mo 0.96 (0.67–1.39) 0.83 151/611 1.00 (0.68–1.46) 0.99 150/608
    12 mo 0.90 (0.62–1.33) 0.71 143/521 0.93 (0.63–1.38) 0.71 141/518

Values are given as No. of subjects abstaining from smoking for at least 7 days/total population in each study arm, unless otherwise indicated. The total population in each study arm varies between adjusted and unadjusted analysis because of missing covariate values. OR = odds ratio.

*For 1- and 3-month follow-up, data were adjusted in multivariable logistic regression analysis for baseline number of cigarettes smoked daily, baseline educational status, and baseline confidence level in quitting. For 6- and 12-month follow-up, data were additionally adjusted for pharmacologic aids used.