Skip to main content
. 2009 Jun;104(6):1006–1015. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02533.x

Table 1.

Demographic and clinical data.

PG (n = 21) AD (n = 21) HC (n = 21) Test statistic Post-hoc effects of group
Age 37.0 ± 9.6 44.2 ± 9.2 40.2 ± 13.6 F(2,60) = 2.23, NS
Years of education 12.9 ± 2.9 11.9 ± 3.4 13.5 ± 2.4 F(2,60) = 1.70, NS
South Oaks Gambling Screen Score 9.67 ± 5.8 0.57 ± 0.87 0.24 ± 0.54
SADQ—Alcohol Dependence Severity 33.7 ± 16.0
AUDIT-C Alcohol Consumption 7.1 ± 3.0 4.7 ± 2.7 F(1,40) = 7.30, P = 0.011
Drug Abuse Screening Testa 2.5 ± 2.8 1.8 ± 2.9 0.5 ± 1.3 χ2(2) = 7.16, P = 0.028 PG>HC
Beck Depression Inventory II 13.2 ± 9.7 20.9 ± 11.8 5.3 ± 4.3 F(2,59) = 14.88, P < 0.001 AD>PG>HC

PG: problem gambler; AD: alcohol-dependent; HC: healthy control.

a

Data distributed non-normally, tested using Kruskal–Wallis; NS: not significant.