Table 1.
PG (n = 21) | AD (n = 21) | HC (n = 21) | Test statistic | Post-hoc effects of group | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age | 37.0 ± 9.6 | 44.2 ± 9.2 | 40.2 ± 13.6 | F(2,60) = 2.23, NS | – |
Years of education | 12.9 ± 2.9 | 11.9 ± 3.4 | 13.5 ± 2.4 | F(2,60) = 1.70, NS | – |
South Oaks Gambling Screen Score | 9.67 ± 5.8 | 0.57 ± 0.87 | 0.24 ± 0.54 | – | – |
SADQ—Alcohol Dependence Severity | – | 33.7 ± 16.0 | – | – | – |
AUDIT-C Alcohol Consumption | 7.1 ± 3.0 | – | 4.7 ± 2.7 | F(1,40) = 7.30, P = 0.011 | – |
Drug Abuse Screening Testa | 2.5 ± 2.8 | 1.8 ± 2.9 | 0.5 ± 1.3 | χ2(2) = 7.16, P = 0.028 | PG>HC |
Beck Depression Inventory II | 13.2 ± 9.7 | 20.9 ± 11.8 | 5.3 ± 4.3 | F(2,59) = 14.88, P < 0.001 | AD>PG>HC |
PG: problem gambler; AD: alcohol-dependent; HC: healthy control.
Data distributed non-normally, tested using Kruskal–Wallis; NS: not significant.