Table 5.
Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive/negative predictive value of SR for special lesions in 289 patients (%)
| Enteric lesions | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | Positive pv | Negative pv |
| Common lesion | |||||
| Esoenteritis | 78.6 | 32.9 | 38.8 | 14.9 | 91.1 |
| Mucosal 66.0ulcer/erosion | 30.5 | 35.7 | 14.0 | 84.0 | |
| Bleeding | 91.8 | 53.6 | 60.9 | 31.6 | 96.6 |
| Space- occupying lesion | 42.9 | 67.3 | 65.2 | 11.1 | 92.5 |
| Angioectasia | |||||
| Telangiectasis 20.0 | 80.1 | 79.2 | 1.6 | 98.4 | |
| Angioectasia | 9.4 | 87.2 | 79.5 | 7.5 | 89.7 |
| Angioma | 57.1 | 92.1 | 91.3 | 13.8 | 98.9 |
| Rare lesion1 | 21.4 | 82.8 | 80.1 | 5.4 | 5.9 |
pv: Predictive value.
1
Because the samples of the rare lesions were not enough, so they were pooled together for the research.