Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2010 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Bone. 2009 Jun 2;45(3):427–434. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.01.468

Table 2.

A comparison of the mineral contents based on the XPS data performed on the fracture surfaces of young (48-year-old) and old (78-year-old) bone.

48-year-old female
Location C O Si Na Zn N Ca P Mg Cl P/Ca
1 80.9 13.6 2.4 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.4 0.1 0 0 4.00
2 80.3 13.4 1.6 1.3 1.0 1.6 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 2.00
3 82.1 13.7 1.1 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.1 0 0 4.00
4 77.8 15.6 1.7 0.4 1.0 2.2 0.3 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.50
5 80.8 13.7 3.5 0.4 0.5 0 0.7 0.1 0.3 0 7.00
6 79.9 14.2 2.0 0.7 0.9 0.6 0.5 0.7 0.5 0 0.71

Average (S.D.) 80.3* (1.43) 14.03 (0.81) 2.05* (0.83) 0.87 (0.42) 0.87* (0.19) 0.92 (0.82) 0.42* (0.17) 0.28 (0.29) 0.23 (0.20) 0.05 (0.08) 3.04 (2.47)
78-year-old-female
Location C O Si Na Zn N Ca P Mg Cl P/Ca

1 81.7 12.8 0 0 0 0.8 3.8 0.7 0 0.2 5.43
2 76.8 14.8 0.1 0.9 0.1 1.3 4.2 1.6 0.1 0.1 2.63
3 75.6 15.1 0.7 0.6 0 2.8 3.4 1.1 0.2 0.5 3.09
4 72.5 15.2 0.2 0.8 0 2.8 2.1 5.5 0 1.0 0.38
5 65.9 13.8 0.4 1.6 0 1.5 2.1 12.1 0.1 2.6 0.17
6 71.4 17.0 0.3 1.2 0 1.2 2.2 5.7 0.2 0.9 0.39

Average (S.D.) 73.98* (5.37) 14.78 (1.42) 0.28* (0.25) 0.85 (0.54) 0.02* (0.04) 1.73 (0.86) 2.97* (0.95) 4.45 (4.35) 0.10 (0.09) 0.88 (0.92) 2.01 (2.09)
*

This indicates a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) between the means of the young and the old.