Skip to main content
. 2009 Jul 7;116(10):1380–1386. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02254.x

Table 2.

Primary and secondary outcomes at 12 months following surgery

Variable Mesh (n= 69) No mesh (n= 70) P-value
Objective success (POP-Q stage 0 or 1)at 12 months of subjects returning forfollow up 51/63 (81.0%) 40/61 (65.6%) 0.07*
Objective success (POP-Q stage 0 or 1)at 12 months assuming subjects lost tofollow up as failures 51/69 (73.9%) 40/70 (57.1%) 0.049*
Objective success (POP-Q stage 0 or 1)at 12 months assuming subjects lost tofollow up as successes 57/69 (82.6%) 49/70 (70.0%) 0.11*
PSI-QOL, mean change from preoperativeto 12 months score** (SD) −6.93 (±8.25) −7.77 (±7.43) 0.58***
No. subjects analysed 55  53
SUDI, mean change from preoperativeto 12 months score** (SD) −20.4 (±29.5) −17.6 (±30.9) 0.62***
No. subjects analysed 59  57
SIIQ, mean change from preoperative to12 months score** (SD) −17.3 (±30.9) −15.0 (±33.2) 0.76***
No. subjects analysed 35  37
CCCS, mean change from preoperativeto 12 months score** (SD) −1.00 (±4.20) −0.75 (±4.30) 0.78***
No. subjects analysed 50 44
Subjects reporting a VAS for satisfactionwith surgery of ≥80/100 45/59 (91.5%) 51/63 (81.0%) 0.12*
Awareness of prolapse 3/61 (4.9%) 7/62 (11.3%) 0.32*
*

Fisher’s exact test.

**

A negative change indicates a decrease in score over time and improved symptoms or impaired quality of life.

***

Two sample t-test for independent means.