Skip to main content
. 2009 Aug 25;10(4):609–619. doi: 10.1007/s10162-009-0182-y

TABLE 3.

Contrasts evaluated using the linear model

Contrast Data From Stimulus Level (dB SPL) Rove/no rove F0 tested (Hz) Data shown
NH vs HI, equal SPL Exp 2 80 No rove 50–800 Figure 3A
NH vs HI, equal SL Exp 2, 3 40 (NH),80 (HI) No rove 50–500 Figure 3B
NH low vs high level Exp 2, 3 40, 80 No rove 50–500 Not shown
NH rove vs no rove Exp 2,4 80 Rove, no rove 50–800 Figure 4A
NH vs HI, rove Exp 4 80 Rove 50–800 Not shown
HI rove vs no rove Exp 2, 4 80 Rove, no rove 50–800 Figure 4B

Each contrast tests the null hypothesis that the average difference in performance across fundamental frequencies is not significantly different from 0. The last column indicates which figure displays the data from each contrast