TABLE 3.
Contrast | Data From | Stimulus Level (dB SPL) | Rove/no rove | F0 tested (Hz) | Data shown |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
NH vs HI, equal SPL | Exp 2 | 80 | No rove | 50–800 | Figure 3A |
NH vs HI, equal SL | Exp 2, 3 | 40 (NH),80 (HI) | No rove | 50–500 | Figure 3B |
NH low vs high level | Exp 2, 3 | 40, 80 | No rove | 50–500 | Not shown |
NH rove vs no rove | Exp 2,4 | 80 | Rove, no rove | 50–800 | Figure 4A |
NH vs HI, rove | Exp 4 | 80 | Rove | 50–800 | Not shown |
HI rove vs no rove | Exp 2, 4 | 80 | Rove, no rove | 50–800 | Figure 4B |
Each contrast tests the null hypothesis that the average difference in performance across fundamental frequencies is not significantly different from 0. The last column indicates which figure displays the data from each contrast